All posts tagged Paul and the Faithfulness of God

  • N.T. Wright and the Faithfulness of Paul: Part 2: Birds in Paul’s Head

    I am blogging my way through N.T. Wright’s Paul and the Faithfulness of God creating an outline of the book as a part of a class I am teaching at our church. This is the second of a nine-part series. All quotations followed by a number in parenthesis are quotes from the book. 

    N.T. Wright and the Faithfulness of Paul
    Part 2: Birds in Paul’s Head
    Paul and the Faithfulness of God, Chapters 2-5

    I. Paul’s Historical Context
    “Paul lived and worked, in fact, in at least three worlds at once, each of which is subdivided. His life and work must sometimes have appeared just as bewildering to those who lived in those worlds as it does to us in our attempts to reconstruct them (and to understand him). In fact, much more so. We have two dangerous advantages: length of hindsight, shortage of material.” (75)

    A. These worlds are Jewish, Greek, and Roman
    They were each distinct, but deeply intertwined worlds alive in Paul’s imagination & thoughts.

    B. A review of worldview within a cultural setting
    1. Praxis: What were the common practices?
    2. Symbol: What were the key symbols?
    3. Story: What narratives shaped the culture?
    4. Question: What were the BIG questions people were asking?

    II. Hovering Birds: The Jewish World
    “What I am…concerned with here is certain emphases and angles of vision, rather than a major retelling of the story of the Jews in the first century or a major new sketch of their worldview, beliefs and hopes. I hope in particular to bring out the way in which the faithfulness of Israel’s God functions as a theme throughout so much of the period.” (77)

    A. The Pharisees
    Pharisees were a popular and influential movement of Jews in the first century concerned with religious and civic/social purity, not in terms of personal holiness, but as a “sign and seal” of loyalty to Israel and to Israel’s God.

    The heart of Pharisaical life was prayer, rooted in the Shema (Hear O Israel the LORD is our God, the LORD is one), but Pharisees were a kingdom-of-God, and thus political, movement. They shared with the Zealots a “zeal,” for the Kingdom of God, meaning they were prepared to enter in a holy war as instruments of the reign of Israel’s God.

    “Zealous” did not mean wholeheartedly devoted or passionate, but willing to become violent. N.T. Wright points to the use of the “zealous” in the Maccabean revolt.

    Paul, after being arrested in Jerusalem, writes: “I am a Jew, born in Tarsus in Cilicia, but brought up in this city, educated at the feet of Gamaliel according to the strict manner of the law of our fathers, being zealous for God as all of you are this day.” (Acts 22:3)

    B. The Torah
    The Jewish law (Torah) was a matter of both praxis and symbol. It contained “precise patterns of behaviour” (91) and it served as a powerful symbol in Jewish imagination. The Torah was designed to form Israel into a distinct people separate from the pagan Gentile nations. For example, it contains strict laws regarding who you share your table with or what kind of food you eat.

    C. The Temple
    “The Temple in Jerusalem was the focus of the whole Jewish way of life. A good deal of Torah was about what to do in the Temple, and the practice of Torah in the Diaspora itself could be thought of in terms of gaining, at a distance, the blessings you would gain if you were actually there – the blessing, in other words, of the sacred presence itself, the Shekinah, the glory which supposedly dwelt in the Temple but would also dwell ‘where two or three study Torah’.” (95)

    The Temple is where heaven and earth met. The backbone of Israel’s prayer life was the picture of Yahweh (the LORD) dwelling in the temple. For example: “O God, you are my God; earnestly I seek you; my soul thirsts for you; my flesh faints for you, as in a dry and weary land where there is no water. So I have looked upon you in the sanctuary, beholding your power and glory.” (Psalm 63:1-2)

    “The Temple was a microcosm of the whole creation.” (101) It points to new creation, where God will dwell with his people forever (Revelation 21:3).

    The symbols of “temple, presence, glory, kingship, wisdom, creation, exile, rebuilding, and unfulfilled promise —would be part of (first century Jewish) mental and emotional furniture.” (107)

    D. Jewish questions asked in the first century
    The Jewish people felt like they were “living in a story in search of an ending” (109). So they were asking: We are still in exile. When will Yahweh return to the temple? How could this God not act at last to fulfil his promises?

    Groups like the Pharisees, were not looking to the Torah or the Temple asking, “How do we earn God’s favor so in the afterlife we can avert God’s anger?” They were asking, “When will Yahweh come rescue us, renew the covenant, and thus rescue the entire world?”

    E. The Continuous Story of Israel
    “The (Hebrew) Bible was not merely a source of types, shadows, allusions, echoes, symbols, examples, role-models and other no doubt important things. It was all those, but it was much, much more. It presented itself as a single, sprawling, complex but essentially coherent narrative, a narrative still in search of an ending.” (116)

    The story of Israel, or at least large portions of the story of Israel, are told and retold throughout the Old Testament. This tradition is carried on by Paul and other New Testament figures (e.g. Peter’s sermon at Pentecost, Stephen’s sermon before his stoning, Paul in Romans and Galatians). The prophets begin to look forward to the coming of Messiah.

    There is no one single picture of what Messiah looks like, but in many of the retellings of the story of Israel there is a longing and waiting for Messiah.

    F. The second-Temple period was a continuation of the exile
    The Jews of Paul’s day (a period of time N.T. Wright calls “second temple judaism”) were back in their homeland after the Babylonian/Persian exile but living under the boot of the Roman Empire symbolized the continuation of the exile.

    Many determined from studying the Torah that they were still in exile, because they had not been faithful to the covenant. Therefore groups like the Pharisees were encouraging strict adherence to the Torah so as to be saved. The second-temple Jewish understand of salvation was not “other-worldly” (i.e. going to heaven after death). Their view of salvation was earth-bound. They wanted to be saved from Roman oppression, saved from sin (idolatry and injustice) in order to be the agency for God to do his work of saving the world. “The rescue of human beings from sin and death, which remains vital throughout, serves a much larger purpose, namely that of God’s restorative justice for the whole creation” (165).

    The coming of the day of salvation was seen as the coming of a new age, a new epoch of human history. The salvation life they expected to live was the life of this coming age, that is the life of the age to come, or “eternal life” for short.

    G. The theology of a Pharisee: Three categories: monotheism, election and eschatology
    1. Monotheism: the worship of Yahweh, the one true living God who is the creator of all, yet distinct from his creation, and the God who revealed himself to Abraham, Moses, et. al. Pharisees believed in a “creational and covenantal monotheism” (180).
    2. Election: Israel was chosen by God to live in covenant with him as a part of his plan to rescue and redeem the whole world.
    3. Eschatology: God’s future for God’s world, God making the world right

    To sum up these three in the context of Paul’s Jewish world, we could say: Yahweh, the God of Israel had chosen Israel to be the people through whom God would use to fill the whole world with his glory. (Psalm 72:18, Num 14:20-23, Hab 2:13, Is 11:9)

    III. Athene and Her Owl: The Greek World
    “Paul did not derive the central themes and categories of his proclamation from the themes and categories of pagan thought, that doesn’t mean that he refused to make any use of such things. Indeed, he revels in fact that he can pick up all kinds of things from his surrounding culture and make them serve his purposes….All wisdom of the world belongs to Jesus the Messiah in the first place, so any flickers or glimmers of light, anywhere in the world, are to be used and indeed celebrated within the exposition of the gospel.” (201)

    A. The symbol of the owl
    The owl in Greek (hellenistic) culture came to represent “seeing.” The Greek philosophical tradition was built upon seeing what others could not see.

    B. Religion or philosophy?
    From a Greek point of view, Paul was doing three things which would be perceived more as philosophy than religion. (1) Paul presented a different order of reality beginning with a creator God who had broken into creation. (2) Paul taught and modelled a particular way of life quite different than the way of life known by the Greeks. (3) Paul established and maintained communities resembling the many philosophical schools of the ancient world.

    C. Popular Greek schools of philosophy
    1. The Academy (Plato; Platonism): The world of space, time, and matter was an illusion and less real than the world of “forms” or “ideas,” which is ultimate reality. (e.g. The Allegory of the Cave)
    2. The Lyceum (Aristotle; Aristotelian thought): The material world should be analyzed and categorized in the pursuit of virtue and human flourishing (Greek word: eudaimonia).
    3. The Stoics: All material things are indwelt with divinity (Greek word: pnuema) (pantheism). The goal is to become a sage, wise, self-sufficient, and in harmony with the way things are.
    4. The Epicureans: The gods are far removed (dualism); we have no eternal soul, so pursue tranquility and happiness in this life. (Note: This was not hedonism.)
    “Whereas the default mode of most modern westerners is some kind of Epicureanism, the default mode for many of Paul’s hearers was some kind of Stoicism.” (213)

    D. Greek praxis
    Philosophy, even for Platonists, was not detached from everyday life. Philosophy was a way of life. The goal was to be able to see in the dark.

    E. Greek symbols
    Stoics, as one example of Greek culture, wore simple clothes, ate plain food, lived without much luxury.

    F. Greek stories (myths)
    Platonists told creation stories. The Allegory of the Cave became a founding myth. Stoics told stories of creation by the logos or pneuma working with the primary elements: fire, air, earth and water. Many Greek stories focused on the hero, becoming the invention of the modern individual (e.g. Hercules, Achilles, Odysseus, Perseus).

    G. Greek questions
    What is there? (physics) ⁃ What ought we to do? (ethics) ⁃ How do we know? (logic)

    IV. A Rooster For Asclepius: Pagan Religion
    There was a overlap between philosophy and religion in the pagan, Gentile world of Paul. The Philosophers often spoke of the gods. There were a number of religions being practiced in the ancient world of Paul. His pattern of religion was different than those around him. His proclamation of a crucified Messiah was “a stumbling block to the Jews and foolishness to the Greeks” (1 Corinthians 1:23).

    Religion was not separated from public life. Religion was the very fabric of society. Pagan religions had temples, sacrifices, festivals, and the like. Religion was a matter of action more than belief. Paul’s preaching challenged people to a new and different life.

    V. The Eagle has Landed: The Roman Empire
    Rome took the eagle as its symbol for its power, beauty, and prestige. Rome in the day of Paul was ruled by the Caesar who installed local governors to oversee law and order throughout the empire. Augustus, the first Roman Emperor, was called “Son of the Deified” (Latin: divi filius). Caesar ruled the land promised to Messiah.

    “Rome brought ‘peace’ to the world, at the usual price: submit or die.” (284) “After sixty years (of Roman civil war), they were ready for (peace). Ready, too, to make it divine, and to associate it with the man who had brought it: pax Augusta. It was this ‘peace’ that allowed the apostle Paul, under Augustus’s successors, to travel the world announcing a different peace, and a different master.” (288-289)

    A. List of first century Roman Emperors

    27 BC-14 AD Augustus (Adopted son of Julius Caesar)

    14-37 AD Tiberius (Ruled during the life of Christ)

    37-41 AD Caligula

    41-54 AD Claudius (Ruled during the early ministry of Paul)

    54-68 AD Nero (Ruled during the later ministry of Paul)

    69 AD Galba (Ruled for 7 months)

    69 AD Otho (Ruled for 3 months)

    69 AD Vitellius (Ruled for 8 months)

    69-79 AD Vespasian (Ruled during the fall of Jerusalem)

    79-81 AD Titus (Son of Vespasian; was the general in the siege of Jerusalem)

    81-96 AD Domitian (Arguably the beast from the bottomless pit in Revelation)

    B. Roman symbols
    The fall of the republic led to the Pax Romana under the Caesar, the Roman emperor, so every cultural tool from literature, to coinage, to art and architecture was used to promote the power and presence of Caesar. For example, a bust of the emperor could be found everywhere in the empire.

    C. Emperor worship
    The growing popularity of Caesar led to the development of imperial cults, the worship of the Emperor as divinized. There was no one single unified cult, but many different imperial cults throughout the Roman Empire. The imperial cult was not a religion in the modern sense, but an interwoven part of life in the empire where religion, culture, and politics were interconnected.

    The Roman Senate voted to divinize Augustus, giving him the title divi filius, meaning “son of God” or “son of the deified one.” Augustus did not want public worship. His was more of an honorific title. The announcement of his rise to power was called the “good news” (Latin: euangelia) that brought salvation to Rome. The worship of the emperor started small and began to grow.

    Tiberius was called “son of god,” son of the divine Augustus. Titus demanded to be called “lord and god” (Latin: dominus et deus). By the rule of Titus, “Worshipping the emperors was well on the way to becoming a central and vital aspect not only of life in general but of civic and municipal identity. Whatever we say about either the intentions or the effects of Roman rulers from Julius Caesar to Vespasian, the richly diverse phenomena we loosely call ‘imperial cult’ were a vital part of a complex system of power, communication and control, in other words, of all the things empires find they need to do.” (341)

    D. Jews in the Empire
    Jews had an eschatological objection to the Roman Empire. (Eschatology=”God’s future”)

    “Rome’s claim to have brought the world into a new age of justice and peace, flew, on eagle’s wings, in the face of the ancient Jewish belief that these things would finally be brought to birth through the establishment of a new kingdom, the one spoken of in the Psalms, in Isaiah, in Daniel. Thus, though their resistance to empire drew on the ancient critique of idolatry, the sense that Israel’s god would overthrow the pagan rule and establish his own proper kingdom in its place led the Jewish people to articulate their resistance in terms of eschatology. ” (343)

    VI. Final Thoughts
    Paul remained a Jewish thinker who communicated to Christian congregations spread out in a pagan world. He may choose imagery from either the Roman or Greek world in his writing, but he does so from the position of a Jewish thinker.

  • N.T. Wright and the Faithfulness of Paul: Part 1: Charting the Course

    N.T. Wright and the Faithfulness of PaulLast year the church was given a great gift. N.T. (Tom) Wright finally published his 40-year labor of love, his definitive and substantial book on the theology of Paul entitled Paul and the Faithfulness of God. I started reading it on the first Sunday of Advent and attempted to finish by Easter Sunday. I am still finishing up the last section, but I have been spending weeks going back through the book, outlining it for a lecture-style small group beginning this Sunday at my church.

    Tom has interpreted Paul for us.
    Now I want to interpret Tom for you.

    My goal is to outline the book in nine parts making this massive 1,700+ page book accessible. I have titled my outline “N.T. Wright and the Faithfulness of Paul” underscoring one of the key components of N.T. Wright’s vision of Paul’s theology: faithfulness. The faithfulness of Jesus demonstrates God’s faithfulness to his creation and to his covenant with Abraham. Paul embodies such faithfulness as he reworks and re-imagines some things in light of the coming of Jesus the Messiah and the Spirit. Specifically Paul redefines what it means for the one God of Israel to work through his people to renew and restore his world.

    The outline is more than half way done. I have completed the first five parts, which covers approximately 900 pages of the book. The outline covers many of the key conclusions N.T. Wright reaches and some (but not all) of the key pieces of evidence he calls upon. I will make the complete outline available as a PDF as soon as it is complete, but I will post each part as a new blog post,  each week including the first part which is a general introduction to N.T. Wight and the book.

    N.T. Wright and the Faithfulness of Paul
    Part 1: Charting the Course
    Paul and the Faithfulness of God, Chapter 1

    I. An Introduction to N.T Wright
    N.T. “Tom” Wright is hands-down the most important theological voice in the church today.

    A. Christianity Today article
    He made the cover of Christianity Today in April 2014. In the cover story, UMC Pastor Jason Byassee writes: “People who are asked to write about N. T. Wright may find they quickly run out of superlatives. He is the most prolific biblical scholar in a generation. Some say he is the most important apologist for the Christian faith since C. S. Lewis. He has written the most extensive series of popular commentaries on the New Testament since William Barclay. And, in case three careers sound like too few, he is also a church leader, having served as Bishop of Durham, England, before his current teaching post at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. But perhaps the most significant praise of all: When Wright speaks, preaches, or writes, folks say they see Jesus, and lives are transformed.” (Christianity Today, April 2014, Vol. 58, No. 3, Pg 36, “Surprised by Wright” )

    I agree. I am not the most objective reader of Tom Wright. I consider him to be my primary theology mentor because in him I see Jesus, because in him I see a love for the church.

    More from the Byassee article: “‘I have always had a high view of the Scriptures and a central view of the Cross,’ Wright says. He insists repeatedly that any theory advanced about Paul must be tested with actual exegesis, and he reads the Scriptures as someone happy to be doing so. Most scholars talk about other scholars. Only a blessed few talk about the Bible. Fewer still talk about God. Wright, while standing on the shoulders of many great scholars, tries to talk about God. And he speaks and writes with an urgency that suggests every sentence is even more essential than the last.”

    B. Professional biography

    • BA in classics and BA in theology (Oxford)

    • MA with a focused study on Anglican ministry (Oxford)

    • DPhil (Oxford) Dissertation: “The Messiah and the People of God: A Study in Pauline Theology with Particular Reference to the Argument of the Epistle to the Romans”

    • Lectured at McGill University (Montreal, Canada) (1981-1986)

    • Lectured at Oxford (1986-1993)

    • Dean of Lichfield Cathedral (1994-1999)

    • Canon Theologian of Westminster Abbey (2000-2003)

    • Bishop of Durham (2003-2010)

    • Research Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at St. Andrews (Scotland) (2010 – present)

    • Publications: Nearly 50 books, a complete N.T. commentary series, an original translation of the New Testament, and numerous articles, essays, lectures, and sermons over 40 years (for more information see http://ntwrightpage.com)

    C. His primary focus
    Wright has spent his career focusing on themes related to Jesus, the gospels, and Paul. He writes from the perspective of a historian, paying very close attention to the historical context of the biblical writers.

    II. Paul and the Faithfulness of God
    Wright’s magnum opus (Latin for “great work”) is Paul and the Faithfulness of God, affectionately known as the “big book on Paul.” This book is the fourth in a series of scholarly books on Christian origins.

    A. Roadmap for navigating through the book
    1. Paul’s World (Part 2)
    a. Introduction
    b. Paul’s Jewish world
    c. Ancient Philosophy in a Greek world
    d. First-century Empire in a Roman world

    2. Paul’s Worldview (Part 3)
    a. The convergence of three worlds
    b. Worldview: defined by praxis (practice), symbol, story, and question
    + Praxis: What were the common practices in Paul’s world?
    + Symbol: What key symbols filled Paul’s world?
    + Story: What narratives shaped Paul’s imagination?
    + Question: What were the BIG questions people were asking in Paul’s world?

    3. Paul’s Theology
    a. Monotheism freshly revealed: What’s it mean for the God of Israel to be one? (Part 4)
    b. Election freshly reworked: Who are the covenant-people of God? (Parts 5-6)
    c. Eschatology freshly imagined: What is God’s future for the world? (Parts 7-8)

    4. Paul in His World (Part 9)
    a. Paul and empire
    b. Paul and religion
    c. Paul and philosophy
    d. Paul in his Jewish world
    e. Conclusions

    B. Philemon: A little window into the heart and mind of Paul
    “Paul’s Jewish worldview, radically reshaped around the crucified Messiah, challenges the world of ancient paganism with the concrete signs of the faithfulness of God. That is a summary both of the letter to Philemon and of the entire present book.” (21)

    Onesimus was a slave in the home of Philemon and had met Paul and become a Christian. Wright calls Onesimus more of a “wandering slave” than a “runaway slave.” Paul writes a letter to Philemon asking him to take Onesimus back, not as a slave, but as a “beloved brother” (Philemon 1:16).

    This scene in the ministry of Paul is a peek into his central themes throughout his letters: reconciliation, unity, and partnership (koinonia) through Jesus the Messiah.

    “Why would Philemon and Onesimus be motivated to go along with this costly and socially challenging plan? Answer: because of the implicit theology. Because of who God is. Because of the Messiah. Because of his death. Because of who ‘we’ are ‘in him,’ or growing up together ‘into him.’ Because of the hope.” (30)

    C. Worldview and theology
    Paul’s theology (what he believed about God and God’s world) was dependent upon and shaped by his worldview (how he saw the world).

    1. N.T Wright’s “new perspective” on Paul
    What is at the heart of Paul’s theology? For the Protestant reformers, the heart of Paul’s theology was justification by faith in the context of salvation. Other themes in Paul’s writings were tangential and peripheral. Wright challenges not only the centrality of justification by faith in Paul’s theology, but challenges the reformed (Lutheran & Calvinistic) interpretations of the Paul.

    This challenge has been called the “New Perspective on Paul.”

    New Perspective on Paul 

    Old Perspective on Paul

    Paul’s theology is driven by ecclesiology.

    Paul’s theology is driven by soteriology.

    Justification is both juridical and participatory.

    Justification is primarily juridical.

    Justification is the declaration of membership in God’s covenant family.

    Justification is the declaration of a right relationship with God.

    Judaism was a religion of grace.

    Judaism was a religion of legalism.

    Paul redefines Jewish thought/categories.

    Paul rejects Jewish thought/categories.

    Righteousness is “covenant faithfulness.”

    Righteousness is a moral quality or legal standing.

    God’s righteousness is his faithfulness to his covenant with Abraham.

    God’s righteousness is his moral integrity.

    We embody God’s righteousness.

    We receive the imputation of Christ’s righteousness.

    The Gospel is the proclamation of Christ’s lordship through his death, resurrection, and ascension.

    The Gospel is the proclamation of justification by faith through grace communicated through the shed blood of Jesus Christ.

    2. Methods to understanding Paul’s theology
    a. History: Paul in the setting of second temple Judaism (Jewish, Roman, Greek influences)
    b. Exegesis: Interpreting Paul’s writings in the light of Paul’s historical context
    c. Application/relevance: How Paul was understood by his contemporaries?

    3. Methods to understanding Paul’s worldview
    a. Praxis: What were the common practices in Paul’s world?
    b. Symbol: What key symbols filled Paul’s world?
    c. Story: What narratives shaped Paul’s imagination?
    d. Question: What were the BIG questions people were asking in Paul’s world?

    4. The contrast
    Theology is our core beliefs about God, his world, and the people he has created. Worldview is the way we look at the world, how we assign value to things (or people), how we prioritize and categorize thoughts. Theology are the constructed evaluations we have made or accepted based on our worldview. Theology is conscious. Worldview is subconscious. Theology is the evaluation of what we are looking at. Worldview is what we are looking through.

    D. Final thoughts
    N.T. Wright envisions Paul and the Faithfulness of God to be an attempt to reconcile theology and history. The predominant modern Protestant interpretation of Paul was based in 16th century issues. Wright wants to revisit Paul in the context of the first century. “We must stop giving nineteenth-century answers to sixteenth-century questions and try to give twenty-first-century answers to first-century questions.” – N.T. Wright, Surprised by Scripture (2014), 26

     

  • NT Visits KC

    NT_Wright

    N.T. Wright speaking at Christ Church Anglican (Overland Park, KS)

    Yesterday was (for me) N.T. Wright Day, the long awaited day when I had the opportunity to both meet and listen to N.T. (Tom) Wright lecture live in person. In looking forward to this event I felt like a 14 year-old girl preparing for our One Direction concert. In meeting Tom, I felt like a pastor from the 20th century meeting Karl Barth. I think Tom Wright is important. In a hundred years when the history of theology is written about the early 21st century, I think Tom Wright will stand head a shoulders above the rest as the most influential theologian of our generation.

    I thoroughly enjoyed both the morning and evening lecture. Ellis Brust and the St. Mellitus Theological Centre did a wonderful job hosting the event. Hats off to them and the staff and volunteers of Christ Church Anglican for their hospitality and work in putting together the logistics for this one-day event in such a short time. They announced the event a couple of months ago and it sold out in three weeks.

    While thoughts are still fresh in my mind, I want to share some of the notes I took from both lectures. As all Tom Wright devotees know, he talks fast. He spits forth truth with rapid-fire accuracy. There is no way I can transcribe the entirety of his lectures, but I can share a few notes.

    The evening lecture was a hurried overview of his massive work on Paul’s theology, Paul and The Faithfulness of God. I am finishing the book during Lent. I should be done by Easter Sunday. My goal is to create an extensive outline of the book over the summer and then teach a 10-12 week class on the book in the fall. Tom has interpreted Paul for the church and I want to interpret Tom for you. So if N.T. Wright has left you wanting more, hold on. A class is coming soon to Word of Life Church.

    Here are some of my takeaways from N.T. Wright Day at the St. Mellitus Theological Centre in KC.

    Morning Lecture

    The Gospel is good news. We cannot assume people are asking the questions that make the good news really good news. People in the Western world today are not walking around asking, “How can I know I am saved and am going to heaven when I die.”

    The gospel is a new way of looking at the world.

    The resurrection is like a strange, but beautiful gift that causes us to remodel our house to be shaped by it.

    The gospel is scandalous and foolishness, but to those of us who believe it is the power of God.

    We need to preach the gospel more than prove it. We do not need to prove it according to the values of Western rational enlightenment.

    The word “god” is a question mark in our culture. Often when people say “I don’t believe in god,” we should say “I do not believe in that kind of god either, I believe in the God revealed in Jesus Christ.”

    God is not distant. (Deism/epicureanism are the dominate views of god in our world.)

    There are many tombs to the unknown god in our world.

    Jesus reveals God. Jesus exegetes God for us.

    Many people in our culture have a passion for justice. We can capitalize on this passion as justice is connected with the Gospel.

    Liberal democracy has NOT brought us utopia.

    Western democracy does not have a narrative to do justice. Progress, yes. Justice, no. God is about bringing a new world of justice and peace. (Isaiah 11)

    We need not a happy triumphalism over the other ways of being human, but a travail in prayer with those who suffer. (This is a picture of doing justice.)

    The 18th century dismissed political theology. Religion was to be private, spiritual, and about heaven. The thought was “let us enlightened, reasonable human beings figure out how to run the world.”

    The church is to speak to power. (The cross was the voice of justice to the powers that be.)

    We get our atonement theology in the redefinition of power.

    We have idolized our modern culture. We have become smug and self-serving.

    Christianity is rejected by modernism and postmodernism for different reasons. They both deny the Christian narrative. We say history turned a corner not in the 18th century age of enlightenment, but at the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Postmodernism rejects all meta-narratives. Postmodernism never sees a turn in human history.

    The big story of Christianity is not a power story but a love story.

    Thoughts from the Q&A after the morning session….
    Paul layers the Jewish narrative for us in Romans that we look through in order to see his point.

    Romans 7 is a retelling of Israel’s story/struggle.

    In a strange way, Israel was to be the Isaiah 53 people suffering in order to bear God’s image.

    Evening Lecture

    Everywhere St. Paul went there was a riot. Everywhere I go they serve tea.

    Paul pitched his tent near the fault lines between Jewish culture, Greek philosophy, ancient religion, and Roman politics.

    God’s new creation has launched through the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus.

    In starting communities loyal to Jesus, Paul started a new discipline, what we call Christian theology. This is the central thesis of Paul and the Faithfulness of God.

    Diverse people come together to be a family in Christ, holy and united, and they need to be sustained by something new…new symbols.

    Paul believes unity happens as these communities practiced what we call “theology.”

    Jews did not do theology, not the way Christians did/do.

    Be ignorant of evil, but be mature in your thinking.

    After Paul says everything he has to say in Romans 1-11 about the Gospel, Jesus’ death, justification, the unity between Jews and Gentiles, etc. he then says in Romans 12 “be transformed by the renewing of your mind.”

    People take doctrinal questions to Paul (and he does in fact have many answers to these questions), but Paul does not simply want to give us a list of answers he wants us to teach people to think Christianly.

    Teach a person to think Christianly and you will build up the church for generations to come.

    Every generation needs to think fresh and new, to face new challenges in the light of Christ.

    Christianity is a new sort of knowing. It is a new epistemology. 2 Corinthians 5 calls this “new creation.”

    Every person in Christ becomes a little model of new creation.

    God is not an object in our universe; we are objects in his universe. He wants us to become thinking objects in his universe, thinking according to a new kind of knowledge.

    What does it mean to be a human being? We reflect God’s love and stewardship to the world, and then we return back the praises of creation.
    God wants people not puppets.

    What is launched in resurrection is transformation.

    Paul’s writing is rooted in Scripture, Paul may quote a line from Hebrew Scripture, but he has the entire context in mind. He was not proof-texting the Old Testament to prove things like justification by faith. Rather, in Romans, he was thinking about the entire Jewish narrative.

    The whole world is to be God’s holy land.

    Genesis 15: Abraham – This is God’s plan to save the world.

    Biblical theology is narrative theology. How does the narrative work? We are invited to participate in it.

    Daniel 9: Daniel’s prayer in exile

    Combine Daniel’s prayer with the expectation of covenant renewal (Deut. 30) and the promise of a new covenant (Jer. 31) and we see the Jewish expectation in Paul’s day. They were expecting liberation and new way of living as the people of God.

    First century Jews were not asking, “How can I know that I will go to heaven and not hell?” They were asking questions about the renewal of the covenant.
    What Israel thought would happen at the end of the age, happened in the middle to one son of Abraham.

    Exodus is retold by Paul, rethought through Jesus and the Spirit.

    Ezekiel 1 is a vision of God’s throne; God taking off (abandoning) the temple.
    Ezekiel 43 speaks of the return of God to the temple.

    Isaiah 40 speaks of the time when the glory will come back.

    First century Jews looked for the return of Yahweh to Zion and none of Israel’s prophets said it has happened yet. It was still a future event. John announces “IT HAS HAPPENED!” John 1. The Word became flesh and tabernacle among us.

    Paul says in him dwelt (this is temple language) the fullness of the God bodily.

    In order to understand Paul, be so soaked in Scripture (Old Testament) that you know where Jesus is going.

    1 Corinthians 8:6: Shema language: The LORD is one. The answer to what to do with eating meat is found in doing theology. God is one. One Lord Jesus.

    Philippians 2: Jewish monotheism and layers of theology

    “Work out your own salvation.” This is not a call to pull yourself up by your bootstraps…rubbish!

    Paul’s task: The new vision of God seen in Jesus and the Spirit.
    Galatians and Romans: A new story of Exodus

    Romans 8: “led by the Spirit” is language from the exodus (pillar of cloud by day / pillar of fire by night)

    Theology is the central task of the church.

    Election: Who are the people of God?
    In Paul, election is renewed. God has ONE family. (Galatians 3) A new people who inherit the promises given to Abraham.

    Justification: not a mechanism for going to heaven

    God’s purpose is to put the world right. This action requires God putting people right.

    Start with God’s people redefined through Jesus and that helps sort out theological problems related to justification.

    Every Christian must learn how to think through:
    MONOTHEISM
    ELECTION
    ESCHATOLOGY

    Eschatology in Paul has little to do with the American fascination with the rapture. A caller to a radio show asked: “How does Mr. Wright think he will get to heaven if he is not raptured?”

    Phil 3: Our citizenship is in heaven, but we are to colonize the world with the culture of heaven.

    Paul redefines monotheism, election, and eschatology around Jesus and the Spirit. This is all political dynamite.

    Power gets redefined around the cross.

    Acts 17: Paul in Athens. He spoke longer than 2 minutes. He probably spoke for 2 hours or more. He navigates between religion and philosophy in order to preach the gospel.

    Theology is joined up for Paul in prayer.

    Romans 9-11 opens with a lament and closes with praise, just like many of the Psalms.

    Paul includes his own prayers in his writing to the Ephesians.

    Our theology does not lead us to know it all, but it leads us to worship.

    Me and Tom, my theological mentor

    Me and Tom, my theological mentor