All posts tagged Jesus

  • The Death of God

    is_god_dead

    Is God dead?

    That was the cover of Time Magazine 43 years ago today.

    Time shocked the religious sensibilities of the Church crowd with their pre-Easter edition asking the lurking question in so many minds during the tumultuous 60s: Is the all-powerful, almighty God talking about by Christians for centuries really dead? This is still a good question to ask four decades later.

    It looks like Newsweek is borrowing a play from Time‘s playbook with their recent cover “The Decline and Fall of Christian America” – in the shape of a cross. I do not have the space here to interact with that article…maybe I will in a future blog, but my initial reaction is “good.” Let the “Christian” America, the neo-Christendom, fall so that the Church of Jesus Christ can emerge. Kierkegaard calls Christendom (when the Christian faith is too closely enmeshed with a political nation) a “misfortune” because people think they are Christians because they live in a “Christian” nation. He says in Christendom “All became as simple as thrusting a foot into the stocking. And quite naturally, because in that way Christianity became paganism.” (From Training In Christianity I.f)

    No the Christian faith, the Christian gospel, the Christian Church must be subversive if it is to retain its revelatory identity.

    Does the fall of Christian America mean the death of God? Perhaps. But back to the Time magazine article.

    The cover story in the 1966 Time “Death of God” issue is entitled “Toward a Hidden God.” It opens with these lines.

    Is God dead?

    It is a question that tantalizes both believers, who perhaps secretly fear that he is, and atheists, who possibly suspect that the answer is no.

    Is God dead?

    The three words represent a summons to reflect on the meaning of existence. No longer is the question the taunting jest of skeptics for whom unbelief is the test of wisdom and for whom Nietzsche is the prophet who gave the right answer a century ago. Even within Christianity, now confidently renewing itself in spirit as well as form, a small band of radical theologians has seriously argued that the churches must accept the fact of God’s death, and get along without him. How does the issue differ from the age-old assertion that God does not and never did exist? Nietzsche’s thesis was that striving, self-centered man had killed God, and that settled that.

    The current death-of-God group believes that God is indeed absolutely dead, but proposes to carry on and write a theology without theos, without God.

    The article created quite a stir in the Church in the 1960s. Some questioned whether it was a perverted prophecy, wondering if this was forecasting the future—a world without God. The article centered on a small group of theologians who developed a doctrine aptly titled “The Death of God.” One of the guys leading this cause was Thomas Altizer, an English professor at Emory University in Atlanta. Altizer’s Ph.D. work was in the area of theology and he had taught religion courses in the past.

    The theory concocted by the “death of God” group was that God poured his entire being into Jesus of Nazareth, and then when he died on the cross, he poured the entirety of God’s spirit on the earth so that God himself ceased to exist. The death of Christ was essentially the death of God, the annihilation of the existence of God. These guys were not popular, as you can imagine. They built their idea (in part) on the thoughts of German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche who, in the nineteenth century, proclaimed the death of God. The madman in Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra becomes his spokesman, saying:

    God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
    —Friedrich Nietzsche
    Thus Spoke Zarathustra
    (1883-1885)

    We can laugh at Nietzsche’s claim, saying to ourselves “surely God is not dead. He is still at work in the earth. He has not ceased to be.” Nevertheless, we are living in a world where people are increasing living their lives as is God is dead.

    USA TODAY ran a cover story a few weeks ago proclaim the decline of the Christian faith in the United States. A study done by the American Religious Identification Survey, reports that even though the population has grown by 50 million people in the last 18 years, 15% of Americans claim no religion at all. That is up from 8% in 1990. One of the researchers said, “More than ever before, people are just making up their own stories of who they are. They say, ‘I’m everything. I’m nothing. I believe in myself.'”

    The subtext to his statement is: God is indeed dead.

    People may be open to spirituality, but the idea of an all-powerful, infinite, eternal God who has created heaven and earth and demands a certain moral standard out of people is increasingly become a dead idea. When Nietzsche wrote and proclaimed the death of God, he was referring to the death of the Christian religion and the death of proclamation of the Christian Gospel.

    But the death of the Christian gospel means that people will live as if God is dead.

    And that is what we see when we see evil and oppression in the world—people living as practical atheists, living as if God is dead.

    Yet it is not completely unthinkable. I believe there is a time when we can say God died. When Jesus was born, we rightly say that God joined us; he became one of us. We call this the incarnation. At Christmas time, we celebrate the birth of Jesus as Emmanuel – God with us; God joining us in human birth. And yet when we look at the death of Jesus, we cannot over look the implication; God also joined us in human death.

    And when the sixth hour had come, there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour. [34] And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” which means, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” [35] And some of the bystanders hearing it said, “Behold, he is calling Elijah.” [36] And someone ran and filled a sponge with sour wine, put it on a reed and gave it to him to drink, saying, “Wait, let us see whether Elijah will come to take him down.” [37] And Jesus uttered a loud cry and breathed his last. [38] And the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. [39] And when the centurion, who stood facing him, saw that in this way he breathed his last, he said, “Truly this man was the Son of God!” Mark 15:33-39 ESV

    The Church has traditionally celebrated three holidays – the holy days – that correspond with the passion of Christ: Good Friday, Holy Saturday, and Resurrection Sunday. These three holy days correspond to the three events proclaimed in our gospel, the central Christian message of the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus.

    Good Friday climaxes with the death of Christ, but is also a day to reflect on the suffering of Jesus.
    Holy Saturday is the day of morning when Jesus’ lifeless body lay in the tomb.
    Resurrection Sunday is the day Jesus rose up from the dead.

    Good Friday unites God with our sin and suffering.
    Resurrection Sunday unites God with our new life and future resurrection.
    But Holy Saturday unites God with the ultimate payment for our sin – death itself.

    Jesus died not only as the Son of Man, but as the Son of God. He never ceased being God when he was born a man and he never ceased being God when he died as a man. So in a real sense, God in Christ died and on Holy Saturday God himself was united with a cold, lifeless, human corpse.

    This is the real offensiveness of the Christian message, but it is at the heart of all we believe.

    Holy Saturday does indeed mean the death of God.

    But Holy Saturday is not the end. Our message is not simply death and burial, but death, burial, and resurrection.

    As awful and horrific as Good Friday & Holy Saturday is, the good news is that Resurrection Sunday is coming!

    Prepare for the celebration.

    Strike up the band.

    Crank up the amps.

    Turn up the lights.

    Sunday will be the ultimate Christian celebration, when we celebrate “the love which has given itself in death is now renewed with the new life of resurrection” (N.T. Wright).

    God in Jesus did join us in human death so that we could join him is resurrection!

  • The Cross of Christ

    April 12th is Easter, Resurrection Sunday, the ultimate day of Christian celebration when we celebrate Jesus’ triumph over death and hell. In order to prepare for Resurrection Sunday, we are spending five weeks on Sunday mornings talking about “The Cross of Christ.”

    For a number of years I did not prepare for Resurrection Sunday. Ok, so maybe I went shopping for a new tie, but for the most part Resurrection Sunday was just another Sunday. This is not our heritage as followers of Christ. The church has always celebrated the resurrection on Sunday. This is why we normally conduct worship services on the Sunday; it honors the day Jesus rose from the dead. Every Sunday is a mini-celebration of the resurrection. Nevertheless, for hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of years the Church has dedicated on day to be the ultimate celebration of the resurrection, the Sunday after the first full moon after the first day of Spring…Resurrection (or Easter) Sunday.

    Resurrection Sunday has historically been a day of celebration…renewing ourselves in the joy of the resurrection. And to experience the joy of the resurrection you need to reflect on the sorrow of the cross.

    Lent is the historic way to prepare for Resurrection Sunday.

    Lent is a way to identify with Jesus’ 40 day fast in the wilderness before his public ministry began.

    Lent is a way to reflect on the cross.

    At the cross we see Jesus not as:
    •    Our life coach
    •    Our love guru
    •    Our therapist
    •    Our motivational speaker
    •    Or our mystic guide

    Rather we see a humiliated, failed revolutionary being executed by the reigning empire… a failed revolutionary who billions of people for nearly 2,000 years have worshipped as the Son of God and Savior.

    So why would he do it?

    The 19th Century Danish philosopher Soren Kiekegaard said about Jesus:

    “That one should push through the crowd in order to get to the spot where money is dealt out, and honor, and glory – that one can understand. But to push oneself forward in order to be flogged – how sublime, how Christian, how stupid!”Training in Christianity

    The cross is a paradox, a contradiction.

    At the cross we see the glory and the shame; the beauty and pain in Jesus death.

    For many people the cross is simply offensive. It is offensive to people who (like the ancient Greeks) are looking for wisdom, or self-help principles, or trite, pithy, common-sensical statements about life. Those who are looking into Christianity in order to find something to improve their lives are often offended when they are offered a bloody, tortured man on a cross.

    It is a shocking, horrific scene, pitiful and offensive, but the cross of Christ is the pinnacle of history. Time is split by this one six hour event into BC (before Christ) and AD (not “After Death,” but the Latin phrase: Anno Domini, “after death). The cross of Christ split time and it is central to what we believe as followers of Christ.

    Jesus died for our sins according to the Scriptures. This is of primary importance.

    The Apostle Paul, who was a religious hit man turned early church leader told a church in the ancient world: “I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and him crucified.”

    Here’s the deal:

    God who is maker of heaven and earth created us in his image. Sin perverted and corrupted us like a PC with corrupt files that will never boot up Windows no matter how much we cuss, scream, and bang on the keyboard.

    Sin has made us less than human and utterly/eternally disconnected from God our Creator and Father. Because of our sin, we deserve death, hell, judgment, and punishment. But GOOD NEWS—Jesus came to be our substitute. On the cross, Jesus died in our place for our sins, bearing the guilt and shame of our sins and bearing the wrath of God, that our sins incurred.

    From the cross, Jesus becomes our Savior and our Healer in order to make us into the new humanity body and soul. As the Savior he forgives us of our sins (past, present, and future). As the Healer he heals us physically and emotionally.

    But forgiveness and healing come only as a result of the unthinkable, the ultimate gasp—the death of God. The cover of Time magazine on April 8, 1966 proclaimed “the death of God” and at the cross of Christ we see that very thing, the unimaginable death of God.

    We will explore theses theme on Sunday mornings at Cornerstone Church in the weeks leading up to Resurrection Sunday, April 12. Here are the five messages:

    March 1 :: The Offensiveness of the Cross
    March 8 :: Jesus our Substitute
    March 15 :: Jesus our Savior
    March 29 :: Jesus our Healer
    April 5 :: The Death of God

  • Book Review: Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana

    Anne Rice has done it again.

    In her second book in the Christ the Lord series, Rice has again skillfully created a historical novel of the life of Jesus that is engaging, historically connected, and true to the image of Jesus in the Gospels. Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana captured my imagination and fueled my devotion with its earthy depiction of an adult Jesus (referred to in the book by his Hebrew name “Yeshua” or “Yeshua bar Joesph”). Rice has continued with her masterful way of balancing the true humanity and true divinity of Jesus in The Road to Cana with vivid description. With Jesus as the narrator, Rice gives the reader another look into Jesus’ inner life, his thoughts, his anxieties, and his longings.

    (WARNING: The following may contain plot spoilers. If you don’t want me to ruin the plot then order the book here.)

    Rice has wisely chosen not to fill in too many gaps between Jesus in the temple at age 12 and his baptism at approximately age 30. The Road to Cana begins during the winter before Jesus’ baptism. We see less of his interaction between his mother, his father, and Uncle Cleopas and more of his interaction with his older brother James. There is a reference to his brother James being the son of another woman and not Mary, the mother of Jesus. Also there is a reference to Jesus calling his cousins his “brothers and sisters.” This classification is in harmony with the Catholic tradition that Mary remained a virgin and had no other children. Protestants may disagree, but this theological determination regarding Jesus’ family in no way takes away from the power of the story.

    One of the triumphs of the book is Rice’s ability to portray Jesus’ romantic feelings in a pure, noble, and historically true way. Jesus’ temptation in this regard is completely free of the trashy, 20th century, sex-obsessed descriptions of his romantic feelings as seen in other contemporary stories of Jesus. Jesus is enraptured with a young woman named Avigail. She is a fictions character, but she could have very well been in Jesus’ life in first century Israel. I don’t want to give away too much of the plot, but Avigail plays an import role in The Road to Cana. Jesus’ love for her is very holy and very real. Rice does a wonderful job describing the pressure Jesus was under to take Avigail as his bride. The temptation was not unbridled lust, but the temptation to marry according to cultural standards. Jesus longs to make Avigail his bride, but he knows this is not his call. The interactions between Jesus and Avigail are wonderfully written.

    The first half of the book sets the historical and personal context of the life of Jesus leading up to the Gospel accounts of his baptism, his temptation, and the beginning of his miracle ministry, including the miracle at Cana. Rice describes Jesus’ baptism and subsequent temptation in the wilderness with magical imagery and direct quotations from Scripture. She remains faithful to the gospel narrative and fills in the biblical text with wonderful color and texture.

    In the front of the book she has a quote from Karl Rahner: The truth of faith can be preserved only by doing a theology of Jesus Christ, and by redoing it over and over again.

    Anne Rice has used her gifts as a writer to do just that, redoing a theology of Jesus Christ on the canvass of biblical and historical orthodoxy…a historical-fiction-kind-of-theology that has great benefit for those of us on the journey of knowing, loving, and following Jesus.

  • Eighteen Years

    Commit your way to the LORD, Trust also in Him, and He will do it. Psalm 37:5 NASB

    Eighteen years ago I read these words.

    No joke.

    I was no fool.

    I read these words.

    They became to me the very spoken words of God.

    He said, “Commit your ways to me and I will do it.”

    I did and he did.

    I committed my life to Christ.

    God saved me.

    These words utterly changed my life.

    Changed my past.

    Changed my future.

    Everything I am doing now is rooted in that moment.

    Eighteen years ago.

    1990 doesn’t seem that long ago.

    Eighteen years?

    Can’t be true.

    Time waits for no man.

    Things are the same.

    Things have changed.

    Lot of water under the bridge, Lot of other stuff too
    Don’t get up gentlemen, I’m only passing through

    People are crazy and times are strange
    I’m locked in tight, I’m out of range
    I used to care, but things have changed

    I’ve been walking forty miles of bad road
    If the Bible is right, the world will explode

    Bob Dylan, “Things Have Changed,” 1999 [Video]

  • Anne Rice’s New Book


    I just ordered Anne Rice’s new book, Christ the Lord: The Road to Cana. This is the sequel to her 2005 work, Christ the Lord: Out of Egypt.

    Read my review of Out of Egypt here.

    I really enjoyed the first book and I am looking forward to reading the second in the series. Anne Rice, who is known for the Vampire Chronicles. A renewal of her faith in the late 90s and committed her writing career to the Lord. She has vowed to write books only for Jesus.

    The following is an editorial she wrote in the Washington Post about her spiritual journey.

    My Trust in My Lord
    by Anne Rice

    Look: I believe in Him. It’s that simple and that complex. I believe in Jesus Christ, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, the God Man who came to earth, born as a tiny baby and then lived over thirty years in our midst. I believe in what we celebrate this week: the scandal of the cross and the miracle of the Resurrection. My belief is total. And I know that I cannot convince anyone of it by reason, anymore than an atheist can convince me, by reason, that there is no God.

    A long life of historical study and biblical research led me to my belief, and when faith returned to me, the return was total. It transformed my existence completely; it changed the direction of the journey I was traveling through the world. Within a few years of my return to Christ, I dedicated my work to Him, vowing to write for Him and Him alone. My study of Scripture deepened; my study of New Testament scholarship became a daily commitment. My prayers and my meditation were centered on Christ.

    And my writing for Him became a vocation that eclipsed my profession as a writer that had existed before.

    Why did faith come back to me? I don’t claim to know the answer. But what I want to talk about right now is trust. Faith for me was intimately involved with love for God and trust in Him, and that trust in Him was as transformative as the love.

    Right now as I write this, our nation seems to be in some sort of religious delirium. Anti-God books dominate the bestseller lists; people claim to deconstruct the Son of Man with facile historical treatments of what we know and don’t know about Jesus Christ who lived in First Century Judea. Candidates for public office have to declare their faith on television. Christians quarrel with one another publicly about the message of Christ.

    Before my consecration to Christ, I became familiar with a whole range of arguments against the Savior to whom I committed my life. In the end I didn’t find the skeptics particularly convincing, while at the same time the power of the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John swept me off my feet.

    And above all, when I began to talk to Jesus Christ again it was with trust.

    On the afternoon in 1998 when faith returned, I experienced a sense of the limitless power and majesty of God that left me convinced that He knew all the answers to the theological and sociological questions that had tormented me for years. I saw, in one enduring moment, that the God who could make the Double Helix and the snow flake, the God who could make the Black holes in space, and the lilies of the field, could do absolutely anything and must know everything — even why good people suffer, why genocide and war plague our planet, and why Christians have lost, in America and in other lands, so much credibility as people who know how to love. I felt a trust in this all-knowing God; I felt a sudden release of all my doubts. Indeed, my questions became petty in the face of the greatness I beheld. I felt a deep and irreversible assurance that God knew and understood every single moment of every life that had ever been lived, or would be lived on Earth. I saw the universe as an immense and intricate tapestry, and I perceived that the Maker of the tapestry saw interwoven in that tapestry all our experiences in a way that we could not hope, on this Earth, to understand.

    This was not a joyful moment for me. It wasn’t an easy moment. It was an admission that I loved and believed in God, and that my old atheism was a façade. I knew it was going to be difficult to return to the Maker, to give over my life to Him, and become a member of a huge quarreling religion that had broken into many denominations and factions and cults worldwide. But I knew that the Lord was going to help me with this return to Him. I trusted that He would help me. And that trust is what under girds my faith to this day.

    Within days of my return to Christ, I also became aware of something very important: that the first temptation we face as returning Christians is to criticize another Christian and his or her way of approaching Jesus Christ. I perceived that I had to resist that temptation, that I had to seek in my faith and in my love for God a complete certainty that He knew all about these factions and disputes, and that He knew who was right or who was wrong, and He would handle how and when He approached every single soul.

    Why do I talk so much about this trust now? Because I think perhaps that with many Christians it is lacking, and in saying this I’m yielding to the temptation I just described. But let me speak my peace not critically so much as with an exhortation. Trust in Him. If you believe in Him, then trust Him. Trust what He says in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, and trust what He says about having conquered evil; trust that He has won.

    Don’t ever succumb to the fear that evil is winning in this world, no matter how bad things may appear. Don’t ever succumb to the fear that He does not witness our struggles, that He is not with every single soul.

    The Sermon on the Mount is the portion of the New Testament to which I return again and again. I return to the simple command: “Love your enemies.” And each day brings me closer to understanding that in this message lies the blueprint for bringing the Kingdom of God to Earth. The Sermon on the Mount is the full blueprint. And it is not impossible to love our enemies and our neighbors, but it may be the hardest thing we have ever been asked to do.

    But we can’t doubt the possibility of it. We must return to Jesus Christ again and again, after our failures, and seek in Him — in His awesome majesty and power — the creative solutions to the problems we face. We must retain our commitment to Him, and our belief in a world in which, conceivably, human beings could lay down their arms, and stretch out their arms to one another, clasping hands, and bring about a total worldwide peace.

    If this is not inconceivable, then it is possible. And perhaps we are, in our own broken and often blind fashion, moving towards such a moment. If we can conceive of it and dedicate ourselves to it, then this peace on earth, this peace in Christ, can come.

    As we experience Easter week, we celebrate the crucifixion that changed the world. We celebrate the Resurrection that sent Christ’s apostles throughout the Roman Empire to declare the Good News. We celebrate one of the greatest love stories the world has ever known: that of a God who would come down here to live and breathe with us in a human body, who would experience human death for us, and then rise to remind us that He was, and is, both Human and Divine. We celebrate the greatest inversion the world has ever recorded: that of the Maker dying on a Roman cross.

    Let us celebrate as well that throughout this troubled world in which we live, billions believe in this 2,000-year-old love story and in this great inversion — and billions seek to trust the Maker to bring us to one another in love as He brings us to Himself.

    Source: http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2008/03/go_tell_it_on_the_mountain_aga.html

  • Good Friday 2008

    Today is Good Friday.

    It is a day of prayer, fasting, confession, repentance, and reflection on the sorrow of the cross.
    It is good, because of death, Jesus’ death.
    It is not a “happy-go-lucky” kind of “good.”
    It is a redemptive good.
    It is a reflective good.
    It is a soul-searching good.

    It is good, because it prepares us for Easter Sunday. You cannot experience the JOY of the RESURRECTION without reflecting on the SORROW of the CROSS.

    I am preparing for two services today. Our church will host a noon-time community worship service as a part of the SAMA’s Holy Week services. (SAMA is the Sumter Area Ministerial Association based here in Americus.) We will then hold our annual Good Friday Service tonight at 6:30. I am humbled that a few pastor friends will be in attendance.

    My message tonight grows out of reflections from this week. Here are my thoughts on the cross for this Good Friday.

    Forsaken

    The death of Jesus was a shock to his followers. His original twelve disciples left their families and gave up business to follow Jesus who they thought was their king.

    Earlier, James and John, the Zebedee brothers, had asked Jesus to give them places of honor in the kingdom Jesus would build on earth. Jesus replied… “You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said. “Can you drink the cup I drink or be baptized with the baptism I am baptized with?” (Mark 10:38 NIV)

    “The cup” was not the sweet wine of victory, but the bitter cup of suffering.
    “The baptism” was not with water, but with torture and ultimate death.

    They just didn’t get it. They didn’t know what they were asking…

    On the night when Jesus was arrested, the Bible says: “Then everyone deserted him and fled” (Mark 14:50 NIV).

    When Jesus was arrested it was dark, not only because it was NIGHT, but because Jesus felt the coldness and darkness of abandonment and rejection.

    We worship Jesus as God
    And he is a God who understands human suffering.

    Have you ever felt abandoned?
    Have you ever felt rejected by someone you loved?

    Have you been cheated on?

    Have you been lied to by someone who said they loved you?

    Have you felt betrayed by your friends?

    Have you ever felt isolated?

    Have you ever felt alone?

    You are not alone, Jesus really and truly understands what you are going through. He doesn’t merely understand, because he is God and he knows everything. Jesus understands, because on the day of his death, he felt the same rejection, the same isolation, the same feeling of being forsaken.

    After nails were driven into his hand and feet and he had suffered bleeding and dying on a Roman cross, he felt as if even his own Father had forsaken him. Out of his agony of body and soul, he screamed: My God, my God why have you forsaken me?!? (Mark 15:34)

    I wonder…
    At the cross, where were the crowds?
    Where were the crowds of people celebrating his entry into Jerusalem?

    The haters were there.

    The soldiers were there.

    Where were the ten lepers he touched?
    Where were the crowds he fed?

    Where were the people he healed?

    Where was the woman with the issue of blood?

    Pilate was there.
    The criminals were there.

    The religious leaders who felt threatened by him were there.

    His mother was there weeping.

    Where was Nicodemus?
    Zacchaeus?

    Bartimaeus?

    Where was Peter’s mother-in-law?

    Where was Peter for that matter?

    In addition to the cruelty and excruciating physical pain of the cross, Jesus experienced the loneliness and agony of abandonment and rejection.

    The English word “excruciating” comes from the Latin word excruciates, which has two Latin roots ex, meaning “from” and crux meaning “cross.”Excruciating literally means “from the cross.” It appeared in the English language in the sixteenth century to express the meaning of intense pain and anguish.

    Jesus had a real human body and so he felt real physical pain, excruciating pain. But Jesus also had a real human soul and so he felt real emotional pain, the despair of a soul that had been forsaken and rejected.

    He fulfilled his own prophecy:
    The Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and he must be killed and on the third day be raised to life. (Luke 9:22 NIV)

    The death of Jesus is not the testimony of a revolutionary dying for a cause.
    Many revolutionaries have come and gone.

    His death is not a story of inspiration to motivate us to live a life of self-sacrifice. Many inspirational stories have come and gone.

    The cross is the pinnacle of both human history and the climax of God’s salvation history.

    Jesus suffered rejection at the cross for our sin.
    He suffered the rejection and abandonment we deserve.
    The penalty for sin is not just physical death, but the second death, a death after death. Jesus called this place hell.

    What makes the wrath of hell so awful is not the flames and fire and heat, but the reality that God is not there.

    God’s ultimate punishment for sin is not sadistically torturing people with fire, but completely abandoning us and turning us over to our sin if we choose not to repent.

    The Bible uses a number of metaphors to describe hell:
    o Fire and brimstone (Revelation 14:11)
    o Lake of fire (Revelation 20:14)
    o A place where not even worms die (Mark 9:46)
    o Tormenting flame (Luke 16:24)

    But maybe the best description of hell is simply “darkness.”
    Jesus tells a story of a master who gave his servants a bunch of money and one of them did nothing with it. The Master called that servant “worthless.” Then the master said, “And throw that worthless servant outside, into the darkness, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” (Matthew 25:30 NIV)

    What makes hell horrible is that God is not there.

    Currently, everyone experiences God’s common grace. He power and presence in sustaining all he created. It is hard for us to really understand God’s common grace, because it is all around. It is by his grace we have air to breath, sunlight, rain, vegetation, gravity, relative social order, etc. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together (Colossians 1:17 NIV).

    In hell, God’s common grace is removed. It is an empty and lonely eternal existence of abandonment and rejection that will torment all who choose to remain in their sin.

    At the cross, Jesus suffered the hellish wrath of abandonment for us. He became our substitute. His act of sacrifice became a way for us to be rescued from our sin.

    Romans 5:6-9 NIV You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. [7] Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous man, though for a good man someone might possibly dare to die. [8] But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. [9] Since we have now been justified by his blood, how much more shall we be saved from God’s wrath through him!

    Our response:
    Prayer
    Confession
    Repentance
    Communion

    May your Good Friday be sorrowful and may your Easter Sunday be a celebration!

  • Why I am participating in Lent

    I am preparing for Lent, a 40-day season of prayer and fasting, but not today.

    Today is not a fast day. Today is a feast day. All of the Sundays during Lent are feast days.

    Today was a feast day, because it was Super Bowl Sunday. I just watched the NY Giants knock of the undefeated New England Patriots 17-14. Great game, the best Super Bowl since the Rams beat the Titans in 1999. I was cheering for the Giants all night. I typically don’t like any sports teams from NY, but I was rooting for the Giants tonight. I wanted to see the Patriots lose. Congratulations to Eli Manning, who certainly stepped out of his brother’s shadow and showed himself to be a real champion tonight.

    My hat is off to Eli Manning tonight. They should now call Peyton, Eli’s brother.

    Now the big game is over. The feasting is coming to an end. Lent is before me.

    Lent is a historic Christian tradition of prayer, fasting, confession, and repentance which begins on Ash Wednesday (February 6th this year) and it ends on the Saturday before Easter, March 22nd. It is a spiritual pathway that has been walked by millions of Christians for nearly two millennia.

    To prepare our church for a lent, I have written a guide to Lent and fasting [here]. For some people I understand that it seems odd that I would lead our church into Lent. I mean after all we are non-denominational. We have contemporary music. We let people drink coffee in our sanctuary and I even wear blue jeans on Sunday morning for goodness sake. Why would we ever participate in such a liturgical tradition such as Lent?

    My reasons are many. Let me briefly list some of my reasons.

    I benefit from walking down a well-trodden path.
    Lent is a spiritual pathway that has been walked by untold millions of Christians since the apostolic age (i.e. the third and fourth century AD). Lent grew out of the time of prayer and fasting required by baptism candidates, who were to be baptized on Easter Sunday. It is practiced traditionally by Roman Catholics, Anglicans, Presbyterians, Lutherans, and Methodists. Lent is not merely a matter of “giving up something.” Lent is an ancient pathway that puts people in a position where the Holy Spirit can change them. In walking this ancient path, I am going to spend time reading through the church fathers.

    Next on the reading list is this book on the church fathers: Getting to Know the Church Fathers by Bryan Litfin.

    I am also going to read the works of ten church fathers using this wonderful (and wonderfully free) devotion guide: Church Fathers Lenten Reading Plan

    I have given up on Christian fads.
    The young, hip, contemporary, relevant-obsessed church is looking for the latest fad. I see Christians looking for the most marketable methods, techniques, programs, and tools to continually redesign the look and feel of the local church. I understand this, because I was once there. I went through a phase where I was trying to keep up with the newest, hottest, Christian fads…I jumped headlong into John Maxwell, The Prayer of Jabez, the “40 Days of Purpose,” etc., thinking that these would push me forward in my spiritual journey. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with any of these authors/books/events. They have each contributed to my spiritual life in a unique way. The problem has not been with them, but we me. I have looked to highly marketable tools and techniques thinking they will excel me in my spiritual journey. They haven’t. They aren’t bad, but they are junk food for the soul. I need to walk an ancient path to be the kind of leaders and men that I see in Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Augustine, Maximus the Confessor, Francis of Assisi, Thomas a Kempis, John Calvin, John Wesley, etc.

    I am way too controlled by my passions.
    Jenni and I were watching a reality-based TV show the other night. In it, a man was talking about how his daughter was living in a gay relationship. He talked about how the Bible says that is wrong and that he and the family has taken a stand and told her that her lifestyle choice is wrong and sinful. As the show continues, he reveals that he had an affair four years early and divorced his wife of twenty-some-odd years in order to move in with his girlfriend. When asked why he began the affair. He responded that with this new woman he “felt the fire” of romance in his heart. When he said that, I looked at Jenni and said, “This is why I am fasting.” She looked at my puzzled and so I explained that the problem with this guy wasn’t just his blatant hypocrisy, but the fact that he was controlled by his passions. I feel like that guys. No I have no interest in having an affair! I mean besides it being a sin, who has the time. No, I am controlled to much by my passions. I am embarrassed to admit that my prayer life is undisciplined. I want to walk closer with Jesus. I want to be in a place where the Holy Spirit can continue to deeply and powerful transform me into the image of Christ. This process makes God the Father happy.

    Fasting is not a regular spiritual discipline for me.
    I normally don’t fast. I don’t like to fast. Does anybody really like it? There I go again, listing to my desires and not my heart. In my heart, I want to be the kind of person that loves prayer and fasting. Prayer I am ok with, but I am not much of a fan of fasting. The forty days of Lent gives me a structure that gives me a lot of encouragement to keep up the fast. John Wesley fasted on Wednesdays and Fridays. That guy was a stud. I am not there yet. So I am leaning on the great crowd of witnesses (Heb. 12:1) and listening to their encouragement to fast. John 1:17 says that the law came through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus. However, both of them came through fasting. Moses fasted for 40 days before the giving of the Law (Deut. 9) and Jesus fasted for 40 days before he began his public ministry. For me, I am fasting one, two, or three days during the six plus weeks of Lent. I will fast this Wednesday, Ash Wednesday and I will fast Thursday, Friday, and Saturday before Easter. Traditionally, Christians don’t fast on Sundays during Lent. Every Sunday is a feast day, a day to celebrate the resurrection.

    Join us on this 40-day journey of prayer and fasting during Lent this year. Don’t do it to try to impress God or others with your spirituality. Don’t do it to lose weight. Do it to rightly offer your body as a living sacrifice to God the Father, Son, Holy Spirit.

    If you want more information on Lent and a guide for fasting go to www.cornerstoneamericus.com/lent.

    I am listening to this song tonight. What a great call to fasting and prayer.

    Lay It Down

    Jennifer Knapp
    Jennifer Knapp Live (2006)

    seeing as i found a rock in my pocket
    seeing as i found a glitch in my soul
    make believe won’t hide the truth
    when judgment falls and it falls on you
    bend a knee my friend, bend a knee

    lay it down
    say it’s all my fault, all my fault
    say i believe, i believe
    lay it down
    this the hour of my healing, of my healing, yeah

    pride can break a man right down from iron
    twist him ’round ’round and tatter up a soul
    hand print of God on the small of my back
    my second chance, my second chance
    i’ll bend a knee my friend,
    i’ll bend a knee

    lay it down
    say it’s all my fault, all my fault
    say i believe, i believe
    lay it down
    this the hour of my healing, of my healing, yeah

    my heart, my heart redeemed
    if it pleases You Love
    if it pleases You Love
    if it pleases You Love

    lay it down
    say it’s all my fault, all my fault
    say i believe, i believe
    lay it down
    this the hour of my healing, of my healing, yeah

  • 75% of Americans believe the resurrection of Jesus is literally true

    Andrew Vanover recently blogged on the latest report from the Barna Group concerning the contemporary beliefs in various Bible stories. Barna conducted a nationwide telephone survey in August 2007 of 1000 randomly-selected adults.

    What surprised me most is that 75% of the participants said they believed that the resurrection of Jesus is literally true. Amazing. What does this say about how we have communicated the truth of the resurrection? It is great that so many believe in the resurrection, but why isn’t this belief causing people to live differently? I am preaching on the resurrection this Sunday, so I find this interesting. How is it that people can believe that a human being came back to life and not believe in his claims. Unbelievable.

    Survey respondents were asked if they thought a specific story in the Bible was “literally true, meaning it happened exactly as described in the Bible” or whether they thought the story was “meant to illustrate a principle but is not to be taken literally.”

    When asked about “the story of Jesus Christ rising from the dead, after being crucified and buried,” three out of four adults (75%) said they interpreted that narrative literally. Here is the breakdown of the survey on the question about the resurrection.

      One out of five (19%) said they did not take that story literally.

      Two-thirds of college graduates (68%) believe the resurrection narrative is literally true.

      83% of mainline Protestants take the resurrection literally

      95% of non-mainline Protestants accept the resurrection as fact

      82% of Catholics embrace the resurrection narrative as being true.

      Black adults were much more likely than either whites (74%) or Hispanics (80%) to consider the resurrection to be true.

    You can read the entire report here.

  • Christ Pantocrator (Christ, Ruler of All)

    I just ordered this icon…Christ Pantocrator (pronounced pan-toe-crah-tor).

    I could have said, “I just ordered this picture or print.” But I said “icon” because that is what it is. The Eastern Orthodox tradition has used icons in their worship for years. The use of icons was one of the reasons for the Eastern Orthodox split from the Western Church (the Roman Catholic Church) in the 11th century.

    My guess is that most protestants take offence, or at least have no interest in icons, because it seems too close to idol worship. For me, I have always thought that Christian art has a power to communicate what words alone cannot. Paintings in the Roman Catacombs show Christians praying with hands lifted up in a cruciform position. What a powerful image! Icons–and Eastern or Byzantine icons in particular–are making a comeback in the Church through the influence of postmodern/emerging styles of worship that want to reach back into the historical church and dust off some ancient practices that have long been forgotten.

    Dusting off is exactly what happened with this icon…Christ Pantocrator.

    It hangs in St. Catherine’s Monastery on Mt. Sinai in Egypt. It was first believed to have been painted in the 12th century until some modern scholars discovered that it had been touched up in the middle ages. After it was cleaned of its top coat, they discovered that the icon is as old as the 6th century. This fact makes St. Catherine’s Christ Pantocrator, the oldest remaining icon in the Church.

    “Pantocrator” comes from two Greek words, panto meaning “all” and kratos meaning “strength” or “power.” It is roughly translated “all powerful,” “all mighty,” or “Ruler of all.”

    I ordered my copy of the icon from www.Skete.com/. The following is what they say about the artistry of the icon:

    Christ is traditionally shown with a short beard and long dark hair parted in the middle, holding a jewel-studded Book of the Gospels in His left arm and blessing us with His right hand. Three fingers touch representing His Divinity, and two fingers are up to symbolize that He is fully God and fully Man, the forefinger bent for His Incarnation.

    The Saviour has a serious and intent look, like the King of All looking upon His people. His face is not symmetrical but has a look of dignity and calmness on one side and a different look of arching of the eyebrows causing enlivenment on the other. These dissimilar but complimentary impressions strike a harmony between the Divine and Human Natures of Christ.

    I first used this icon on my homepage (www.derekvreeland.com) before using this current blog template. I have always had some kind of attraction to the icon. It doesn’t seem forign to me, even though it was painted 1500 years ago. There is something familar about it. Something comforting. Something significant. Something worshipful. Knowing the history and the meaning of the artistry, I appreciate it all the more and look forward to hanging it in my office where it can “preach” to me about the person of Christ.

    Since I am in a historical and reflective mood, let me end this post with a prayer from Augustine. This prayer comes from the end of On the Trinity, Book 15, Chapter 28. In the prayer, Augustine reveals that the passion of his heart is to seek the face of God:

    …so far as I have been able, so far as You have made me to be able, I have sought You, and have desired to see with my understanding what I believed; and I have argued and labored much.

    O Lord my God, my one hope, listen to me, for I fear that through weariness I may be unwilling to seek You, but my desire is “that I may always ardently seek Your face.” Do give me strength to seek, you who have made me find You, and has given me the hope of finding You more and more.

    Augustine, On the Trinity, 15:28:1
    Adapted from www.newadvent.org/fathers/130115.htm

  • Rescue, the Trinity & Christ our Example

    On the iPod this morning: Battle Cry by Michael Gungor.

    He was the worship leader at the church Jenni and I attended in Tulsa in the late 90s. He is a phenomenal guitar player and he has developed into a great worship leader. He is currently at Resurrection Life Church in Grand Rapids, MI and travel a lot, so it seems. Battle Cry was the 2006 Aquire the Fire youth conference album. I am happy to see that God is using Michael in a variety of ways. Check him out at http://www.michaelgungor.com/.

    Track 5 on Battle Cry is the song “Rescue.” As I was listening to it this morning, it got me thinking a bit about Jesus, his work and our response. For over two years I have been consumed with this trinitarian vision of spiritual transformation. It has become the theological backbone of my dissertation (which is nearly completed). In this trinitarian vision, spiritual transformation is viewed as the WORK OF THE SPIRIT to transform us into the IMAGE OF THE SON for the JOY OF GOD, THE FATHER.

    Forgive me as I dive into a bit of the historical background of the doctrine of the Trinity.

    I am reading Stan Grenz’s Rediscovering the Triune God. He does a good job of providing an overview of contemporary theologies of the Trinity. I have finished the chapter on the “Karls” (Barth and Rahner) and I am moving on to Pannenberg, Moltmann and Jenson. Both of the Karls were interested in moving away from the speculative nature of trinitarian theology. It is speculative discussions of the Trinity that causes the average church goer to cry: “BORING!” The Karls wanted to look closer at the doctrine of the trinity through God’s revelation (Barth) and God-in-salvation (Rahner), that is the centrality of the incarnation “God with us.” Rahner’s contribution known as “Rahner’s Rule” is that God as he exists in eternity is the God who reveals himself in salvation. The importance of this is that is makes the study of the trinity both biblical and practical. The unknowable, immutable eternal God (the immanent Trinity) makes himself known in his activity (the economic Trinity). This move takes discussions of the trinity to the church, to worship, to discipliship and for me, spiritual transformation.

    It is upon this theological foundation that I have built my trinitarian vision of spiritual formation. God is revealing himself in his work of spiritual transformation, because it is God’s work through the Spirit to transform us into the image of God through Jesus for the pleasure of God himself. We see him in what he does.

    Now back to Gungor’s song “Rescue.”

    As I was listening to “Rescue,” I was reminded of an important point of clarification when I talk about Jesus our example. Jesus is our example of spiritual transformation. He is what we are being conformed into. He is the model for ethical behavior and moral character, but he can only be our example AFTER he has become our savior. The danger of emphasizing the role of Jesus as our example can lead us down the road of pelagianism, a heresy that was condemned by the Church in the fifth century and taught that you can be forgiven of your sins and justified with God by patterning your life after Christ’s moral example. If this was true, then the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus (the central piece of the Christian story) is not necessary.

    Jesus our example (Christus exemplar) is a part of the work of God the Son, but it is subsequent to Jesus our savior, our rescuer. We need Jesus to come and rescue us from our sin and spiritual poverty, before we can follow him and allow the Spirit to transform us into his image. Living a life patterned after Jesus’ example is simply not enough. Beyond that it will leave you frustrated and disillusioned. You cannot try out the Christian life. You have to dive in headlong and allow Jesus to rescue you through faith and repentance. Only then can he become your example.

    “Rescue” has some further trinitarian imagery. As I have been meditating on the trinity, I have been thinking about how God makes himself known through salvation. He becomes “God with us” which encapsulates the wholeness of substance of the three persons, but it can also represent the distinct personhood of the Son. From here we can see God the Father as “God created us” (creation); Jesus the Son as “God with us” (incarnation); and God the Holy Spirit as “God in us” (sanctification). I heard this imagery in “Rescue.” Here are some lines from the song:

    You are the source of the life
    I can’t be left behind
    No one else will do
    I will take hold of You

    … “God created us” (the Father)

    I need You Jesus
    To come to my rescue
    Where else can I go

    … “God with us” (the Son)

    Capture me with grace
    … “God in us” (the Spirit)

    Click here for more on the song “Rescue”